DOJ-OGR-00009013.jpg
585 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
0
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
585 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, is a portion of a court filing that details the responses of 'Juror No. 50' to a pre-trial questionnaire. The juror affirmed under penalty of perjury their ability to decide the case based solely on evidence, stated they had never been a victim of a crime, and had no views on relevant laws that would impede their ability to be fair and impartial regarding the allegations against Ms. Maxwell.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | Potential Juror |
The subject of the document, whose questionnaire answers regarding their ability to be impartial are detailed.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant (implied) |
Mentioned in the context of allegations against her, which Juror No. 50 was questioned about.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Juror No. 50 completed a juror questionnaire under penalty of perjury, answering questions about their ability to serve fairly and impartially.
Relationships (1)
The document details Juror No. 50's sworn statements that they could be fair and impartial regarding the allegations against Ms. Maxwell.
Key Quotes (5)
"Yes,” Juror No. 50 could decide the case solely based on the evidence or lack of evidence and not based on bias, sympathy, or prejudice."Source
— Juror No. 50
(Response to Question 13 of the juror questionnaire.)
DOJ-OGR-00009013.jpg
Quote #1
"No,” Juror No. 50 had never been the victim of a crime."Source
— Juror No. 50
(Response to Question 25 of the juror questionnaire.)
DOJ-OGR-00009013.jpg
Quote #2
"No,” there was nothing about the nature of the allegations against Ms. Maxwell that “might make it difficult” for Juror No. 50 to be fair and impartial."Source
— Juror No. 50
(Response to Question 42 of the juror questionnaire.)
DOJ-OGR-00009013.jpg
Quote #3
"No,” Juror No. 50 did not have any views about laws concerning the age of consent that would affect his ability to be fair and impartial."Source
— Juror No. 50
(Response to Question 43 of the juror questionnaire.)
DOJ-OGR-00009013.jpg
Quote #4
"No,” Juror No. 50 did not have any views about the laws governing sex trafficking and sex crimes against minors that would affect his ability to be fair and impartial."Source
— Juror No. 50
(Response to Question 44 of the juror questionnaire.)
DOJ-OGR-00009013.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document