HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013305.jpg
2.04 MB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
4
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal pleading (opposition to motion for summary judgment)
File Size:
2.04 MB
Summary
This document is page 2 of Bradley Edwards' opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for summary judgment in a civil case. It argues that Epstein's lawsuit against Edwards was a bad-faith intimidation tactic designed to drain resources and deter legitimate claims, asserting that Epstein knew he had actually molested Edwards' clients and had no intention of waiving his Fifth Amendment rights to allow for proper discovery. The footnotes list various evidentiary exhibits, including depositions of Epstein (2012), Edwards (2010), and Scott Rothstein (2012), as well as a transcript of a telephone interview with Virginia Roberts.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant |
Accused of molesting minors; suing Edwards for abuse of process; refusing to waive Fifth Amendment privilege.
|
| Bradley Edwards | Attorney/Defendant |
Attorney representing minors molested by Epstein; target of Epstein's lawsuit alleging wrongdoing.
|
| Virginia Roberts | Victim/Witness |
Mentioned in Footnote 1 regarding a transcript of a telephone interview used as evidence.
|
| Scott Rothstein | Deponent |
Mentioned in Footnote 1 regarding a deposition dated June 14, 2012.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| This Court |
The court handling Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG (likely Florida State Court based on case number format).
|
Timeline (4 events)
2012-10-19
Filing of Second Renewed Motion for Leave to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages
Court
Relationships (3)
Epstein sued Edwards for abuse of process; Edwards represents victims suing Epstein.
Edwards filed a transcript of Roberts' telephone interview as evidence.
Text states 'Epstein knew that he had in fact molested each of the minors represented by Brad Edwards.'
Key Quotes (4)
"Epstein knew that he had in fact molested each of the minors represented by Brad Edwards."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013305.jpg
Quote #1
"Epstein had no intention of waiving his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination in order to avoid providing relevant and material discovery"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013305.jpg
Quote #2
"Epstein was motivated by a single ulterior motive to attempt to intimidate Edwards and his clients and others into abandoning or settling their legitimate claims for less than their just and reasonable value."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013305.jpg
Quote #3
"Epstein continued to pursue his claims by filing the Second Amended Complaint alleging abuse of process against Edwards even after he had paid significant sums in settlement of the claims instituted by Mr. Edwards’ clients against Mr. Epstein."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013305.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document