DOJ-OGR-00030289.tif

46.7 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

7
People
0
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document / court filing (memorandum of law)
File Size: 46.7 KB
Summary

This legal document, a Memorandum of Law, discusses the denial of a protective order sought by plaintiffs in a case (9:08-cv-80119-KAM). The motion aimed to prevent a named party, Epstein, from attending depositions and to exclude him from all depositions of the plaintiffs. The court finds that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate "extraordinary circumstances" and that the motion does not meet the necessary burden for Jane Does 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Epstein Defendant/Party in interest
Plaintiffs' motion seeks to exclude Epstein from all depositions.
Jane Does 2 Plaintiff
Affidavits refer to Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7. Motion does not meet burden for Jane Doe 2.
Jane Does 3 Plaintiff
Affidavits refer to Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7. Motion does not meet burden for Jane Doe 3.
Jane Does 5 Plaintiff
Affidavits refer to Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7. Motion does not meet burden for Jane Doe 5.
Jane Does 6 Plaintiff
Affidavits refer to Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7. Motion does not meet burden for Jane Doe 6.
Jane Does 7 Plaintiff
Affidavits refer to Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7. Motion does not meet burden for Jane Doe 7.
Jane Doe 4 Plaintiff?
The motion does not meet the necessary burden as to Jane Doe 4.

Timeline (3 events)

2009-09-11
Document 296 entered on FLSD Docket.
FLSD Docket
2009-09-17
Document 305-3 entered on FLSD Docket.
FLSD Docket
Plaintiffs' motion to deny a protective order, which seeks to exclude Epstein from depositions, is being discussed.
Court proceedings
Plaintiffs Epstein

Relationships (2)

Epstein Adversarial (legal proceeding) Plaintiffs
Plaintiffs' motion seeks to exclude Epstein from depositions.
Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 Same group/Plaintiffs Plaintiffs
affidavits regarding Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7

Key Quotes (4)

"Plaintiffs' motion is required to be denied as they have failed to meet their burden showing the "extraordinary circumstances" necessary to establish good cause to support a protective order which would grant the extraordinarily rare relief of preventing a named party from attending in person the deposition of another named party."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00030289.tif
Quote #1
"Also requiring denial of Plaintiffs' motion is the fact that it seeks to exclude Epstein from all the depositions of all the Plaintiffs in actions before this Court."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00030289.tif
Quote #2
"Such relief is unprecedented and attempts to have this Court look at the Plaintiffs' collectively as opposed to analyzing each case based on facts versus broad speculation whether "extraordinary circumstances" exist on a case by case basis."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00030289.tif
Quote #3
"The motion does not meet the necessary burden as to Jane Doe 4, or Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, or 7."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00030289.tif
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document