DOJ-OGR-00010396.jpg

735 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing (legal brief/opinion - case 1:20-cr-00330-pae)
File Size: 735 KB
Summary

This document page is from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated April 29, 2022, concerning the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It discusses a dispute over the interpretation of a jury note regarding 'Count Four,' specifically whether the jury was considering conduct in New Mexico versus New York state law. The text details arguments about a missing comma in the note and the Court's instruction that New York law was the governing statute, even if New Mexico events were relevant to intent.

People (3)

Name Role Context
The Defendant Defendant
Refers to Ghislaine Maxwell (based on case number context). The document discusses her legal team's arguments regardi...
The Court Judicial Authority
The judge/court managing the trial, specifically regarding instructions given to the jury.
The Jury Fact Finder
The jurors deliberating on the case, specifically asking questions via notes about Count Four.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Government
The prosecution (DOJ), accused by the defendant of 'muddying the inquiry'.
2d Cir.
Second Circuit Court of Appeals, referenced in case citation.

Timeline (2 events)

Trial
Discussions regarding jury instructions and notes.
Courtroom
The Court The Defendant The Government
Trial
Jury deliberation regarding Count Four.
Courtroom
Jury

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location of testimony, potential sexual abuse, and origin of a flight.
Location of applicable state law and destination of travel.

Relationships (1)

The Defendant Adversarial Government
Defendant accuses Government of 'muddying the inquiry'; legal arguments in briefs.

Key Quotes (4)

"significant or motivating purpose"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010396.jpg
Quote #1
"The note was clear on one point—the jury was asking about the second element of Count Four."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010396.jpg
Quote #2
"the only state law at issue was New York’s, even if sexual abuse in New Mexico was relevant evidence of intent."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010396.jpg
Quote #3
"muddying the inquiry"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010396.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document