DOJ-OGR-00016969.jpg
546 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
546 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge, government attorney Mr. Rohrbach, and defense attorney Mr. Everdell. The parties discuss whether to send an indictment back to the jury due to a wording issue concerning a minor. Both the prosecution and defense unexpectedly agree that this is unnecessary, a rare occurrence that the judge remarks upon.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney |
Represents the government's position, stating they are not seeking to send the indictment back to the jury.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Defense Attorney |
Represents the defense's position, stating they would not like the indictment sent back to the jury.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceeding, asking for the parties' positions and commenting on their agreement.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| The Government | government agency |
Mentioned by Mr. Rohrbach as the party he represents, which is not seeking to send the indictment back.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding a procedural issue with the wording of an indictment, specifically whether it should be sent back to the jury.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (1)
They are opposing counsel in a legal case (government vs. defense) but find themselves in agreement on the procedural issue of not sending the indictment back to the jury.
Key Quotes (4)
"The government is not seeking to send the indictment back, your Honor."Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Stating the government's official position on the procedural question raised.)
DOJ-OGR-00016969.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor, the defense would not like that to happen."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Stating the defense's position, which aligns with the government's on this issue.)
DOJ-OGR-00016969.jpg
Quote #2
"You're in vigorous agreement."Source
— THE COURT
(Observing the unusual consensus between the prosecution and the defense.)
DOJ-OGR-00016969.jpg
Quote #3
"Oh, I thought we were disagreeing. That's so rare. Yes, we're in agreement with that."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(A lighthearted response acknowledging the rarity of agreeing with the opposing counsel.)
DOJ-OGR-00016969.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document