DOJ-OGR-00010055.jpg

405 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

1
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
0
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 405 KB
Summary

This document is a transcript of a legal deposition from March 24, 2022, involving a witness identified as Brune. The questioning focuses on an email and a Westlaw report concerning a person's identity and status as a suspended attorney from the New York State Office of Court Administration. The witness expresses a belief that there was a case of mistaken identity, where a "Bronxville stay-at-home wife" was confused with a suspended lawyer of the same name.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Brune
Subject of the redirect examination, referred to as "Brune - redirect".

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
New York State Office of Court Administration government agency
Mentioned as the source of information on page 11 regarding a person's license status.
Westlaw company
Source of a report dated May 12th that is being discussed.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
The court reporting agency that transcribed the document.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-03-24
Redirect examination of a witness named Brune regarding information found in an email and a Westlaw report.
Brune Unnamed Questioner (Q) Unnamed Witness (A)
A prior cross-examination where the witness testified they didn't think they had anything to investigate about the subject.
Unnamed Witness (A)

Locations (2)

Location Context
Mentioned as the location of a "stay-at-home wife" who the witness believes was confused with a suspended lawyer.
Mentioned as part of the "New York State Office of Court Administration".

Key Quotes (2)

"I don't believe it would have changed what happened here."
Source
— Witness (A) (Responding to whether seeing a Westlaw report earlier would have prompted an investigation.)
DOJ-OGR-00010055.jpg
Quote #1
"I was convinced that she was the Bronxville stay-at-home wife and not the suspended lawyer."
Source
— Witness (A) (Explaining their belief that a report had confused two people with the same name.)
DOJ-OGR-00010055.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document