DOJ-OGR-00015011.jpg
547 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
547 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript showing the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. The questioning centers on scientific articles Rocchio provided to the government, discussing their relevance to the Daubert standard, the recency of an article labeled Exhibit 3, and a specific 'Winters article' from 2020. The witness clarifies the scope of their testimony and corrects the questioner on the recency of the evidence presented.
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| government | Government agency |
Mentioned as the recipient of articles provided by the witness in support of testimony.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
Relationships (1)
The document is a transcript of a cross-examination, where the questioner is challenging the witness's testimony and the evidence provided.
Key Quotes (3)
"I wouldn't presume to make an opinion about -- to offer an opinion about Daubert specifically, but certainly I'm here to talk about the state of the scientific literature in my areas of expertise."Source
— Rocchio (as 'A')
(Responding to a question about disagreeing with an opinion related to the Daubert standard.)
DOJ-OGR-00015011.jpg
Quote #1
"No. That's an example of a recent article that was done and not the most recent, nor is it the only."Source
— Rocchio (as 'A')
(Correcting the questioner's assertion that Exhibit 3 represents the most recent state of scientific literature.)
DOJ-OGR-00015011.jpg
Quote #2
"It's possible that this was pub -- the Winters article we've been talking about was published, I believe, in 2020."Source
— Rocchio (as 'A')
(Providing information about the publication date of a specific article under discussion.)
DOJ-OGR-00015011.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document