DOJ-OGR-00002363(1).jpg
657 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
5
Organizations
2
Locations
5
Events
0
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
657 KB
Summary
This document is a legal argument from a court filing requesting the suppression of evidence and dismissal of certain counts. The argument centers on the crucial role of protective orders in civil litigation, citing legal precedents to assert that these orders encourage full disclosure and must be strictly enforced. The filing applies this principle to the "Maxwell depositions," which it characterizes as highly intrusive, to argue against the use of evidence derived from them.
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Int’l Tel. & Tel. Corp. | Company |
A party in the cited case Martindell v. Int’l Tel. & Tel. Corp.
|
| S.E.C. | Government agency |
A party in the cited case S.E.C. v. TheStreet.Com.
|
| TheStreet.Com | Company |
A party in the cited case S.E.C. v. TheStreet.Com.
|
| Government | Government agency |
Mentioned as a body that might seek testimony from civil cases for criminal investigatory purposes.
|
| Hudson Hall LLC | Company |
A party in the cited case Stewart v. Hudson Hall LLC.
|
Timeline (5 events)
2021-02-04
Document 134 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The court district (Southern District of New York) where the Stewart v. Hudson Hall LLC case was decided.
|
|
|
The judicial circuit mentioned as having a strict standard for modifying protective orders.
|
Key Quotes (5)
"vital function"Source
— Martindell v. Int’l Tel. & Tel. Corp.
(Describing the role of protective orders in civil litigation.)
DOJ-OGR-00002363(1).jpg
Quote #1
"the ‘secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination’ of civil disputes, by encouraging full disclosure of all evidence."Source
— Martindell v. Int’l Tel. & Tel. Corp. (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 1)
(Explaining how protective orders promote the goals of civil litigation.)
DOJ-OGR-00002363(1).jpg
Quote #2
"If protective orders were easily modified . . . parties would be less forthcoming in giving testimony and less willing to settle their disputes."Source
— S.E.C. v. TheStreet.Com
(Arguing against the easy modification of protective orders.)
DOJ-OGR-00002363(1).jpg
Quote #3
"witnesses might be expected frequently to refuse to testify pursuant to protective orders if their testimony were to be made available to the Government for criminal investigatory purposes in disregard of those orders."Source
— Martindell v. Int’l Tel. & Tel. Corp.
(Highlighting a specific reason why witnesses rely on protective orders.)
DOJ-OGR-00002363(1).jpg
Quote #4
"In the Second Circuit, there is a strict standard for modification of a protective order entered by a district court."Source
— Stewart v. Hudson Hall LLC
(Stating the legal standard for modifying protective orders in the Second Circuit.)
DOJ-OGR-00002363(1).jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document