DOJ-OGR-00013348.jpg

570 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 570 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a discussion between an attorney, Ms. Moe, and the judge (The Court) regarding the admission of three spiral-bound message books as evidence. Ms. Moe argues that the books have been authenticated by a witness and are admissible despite hearsay objections, citing precedent from similar evidence already admitted in the trial.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Hesse Witness
Mentioned in the header as the subject of direct examination: "Hesse - direct".
THE COURT Judge
A speaker in the transcript, addressed as "Your Honor," who is presiding over the proceedings.
MS. MOE Attorney
A speaker in the transcript who is arguing for the admission of evidence.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the document as the court reporting service.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
A discussion between Ms. Moe and the Court regarding the admission of three spiral-bound message books as evidence. Ms. Moe argues for their authenticity and admissibility despite hearsay objections.
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."

Relationships (2)

MS. MOE Professional THE COURT
Ms. Moe, likely an attorney, addresses the Court as "Your Honor" and presents legal arguments for the Court's consideration.
Hesse Professional THE COURT
Hesse is identified as a witness undergoing direct examination in a trial presided over by the Court.

Key Quotes (3)

"These three exhibits are spiral bound message books. As their appearance makes clear, no one could tear an object out or put it in there, and so they are a continuous record."
Source
— MS. MOE (Arguing for the integrity and authenticity of the message books being submitted as evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00013348.jpg
Quote #1
"I didn't hear an authentication objection. It was hearsay."
Source
— THE COURT (Clarifying that the objection raised was based on hearsay, not on the authentication of the documents.)
DOJ-OGR-00013348.jpg
Quote #2
"With respect to hearsay, these are admissible for the same reasons the other message pads are admissible and received. They are phone messages that record the date and time of a person calling."
Source
— MS. MOE (Providing the legal argument for why the message books should be admitted as evidence despite being hearsay.)
DOJ-OGR-00013348.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document