DOJ-OGR-00020604.jpg
574 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
574 KB
Summary
This legal document is a motion filed on January 12, 2023, by John M. Leventhal, attorney for the defendant-appellant, requesting a one-month extension to file an appellate brief, moving the deadline from January 30 to February 28, 2023. The justification for the extension is the difficulty in communicating with the client, who is incarcerated in Tallahassee, Florida, and the need for more time to complete the work. The motion notes that the opposing counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Rohrbach, does not object to the request.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Rohrbach | Assistant United States Attorney |
Informed the appellant's attorney that the U.S. Attorney's Office does not object to the motion for a one-month exten...
|
| JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, ESQ. (Ret.) | Attorney for Defendant-Appellant |
Signed and submitted the motion requesting an extension of time to file the appellant's brief.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Attorney’s Office of the Southern District of New York | government agency |
Mentioned as the Respondent's office, which does not object to the requested extension.
|
| AIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS, PC | company |
The law firm representing the Defendant-Appellant, for whom John M. Leventhal works.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2023-01-12
Filing of a motion requesting a one-month extension of time to file the appellant's brief.
New York, New York
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where the client is incarcerated.
|
|
|
The jurisdiction of the Respondent United States Attorney's Office.
|
|
|
Location where the document was dated and submitted from.
|
Relationships (2)
The document states that Andrew Rohrbach, as opposing counsel, communicated to John M. Leventhal that his office does not object to the requested legal extension.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
→
attorney-client
→
Defendant-Appellant (client)
John M. Leventhal is identified as the 'Attorney for Defendant-Appellant' and refers to this individual as 'our client' throughout the document.
Key Quotes (1)
"[f]urther extensions of time will be disfavored."Source
— The Court
(A previous warning from the Court, which the attorney acknowledges while requesting the extension.)
DOJ-OGR-00020604.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document