HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027191.jpg
1 MB
Extraction Summary
4
People
6
Organizations
1
Locations
0
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Digital communication log / email thread
File Size:
1 MB
Summary
This document is a digital communication log from February and March 2017 involving Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted correspondent. The conversation includes a shared news article about the Trump administration proposing budget cuts to development agencies, with the sender noting this would affect 'BG' (likely Bill Gates), the UN, USAID, and the World Bank, commenting that it is 'good news for America.' The thread concludes with Epstein asking 'are we set?' and the correspondent replying 'Not yet' but promising 'This week though.'
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Sender |
Identified by email alias 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com'. Asks 'are we set?'
|
| BG | Mentioned Person |
Likely Bill Gates, mentioned in context of 'foundation' and budget cuts.
|
| Donald Trump | Mentioned in URL |
Mentioned in the Washington Post URL regarding defense spending proposals.
|
| [REDACTED] | Sender/Correspondent |
Correspondent communicating with Epstein about political news and scheduling.
|
Organizations (6)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| UN |
United Nations, mentioned regarding budget cuts.
|
|
| USAID |
Mentioned regarding budget cuts.
|
|
| WORLD BANK |
Mentioned regarding budget cuts.
|
|
| Washington Post |
Source of the news article linked in the message.
|
|
| Google News |
Platform hosting the article link.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Source of the document (Bates stamp).
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the message 'That's good news for America'.
|
Relationships (2)
Exchange of messages regarding scheduling ('are we set?') and sharing political news.
Mentioned as 'BG' in context of foundation budget cuts in a message sent to/from Epstein's thread.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document