DOJ-OGR-00001797.jpg

999 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 999 KB
Summary

This legal document, dated October 14, 2020, is a filing from Ms. Maxwell's defense to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The defense argues that the prosecution must disclose evidence from victims abused by Epstein after 1997, claiming this evidence is exculpatory under the Brady rule because it contradicts the government's theory that Maxwell was Epstein's sole "madam" and principal facilitator. The filing also details how the perjury charges against Maxwell originated from her depositions in a 2015 defamation lawsuit brought by a victim identified as "Accuser-1."

People (4)

Name Role Context
Alison J. Nathan The Honorable
The document is addressed to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan, indicating she is the judge in this case.
Epstein
Mentioned throughout as the perpetrator of sexual abuse. The government's case theory revolves around Ms. Maxwell's r...
Ms. Maxwell Defendant
The subject of the legal filing. The document argues for disclosure of evidence related to her alleged role in Epstei...
Accuser-1 Alleged victim / Plaintiff
An alleged victim of Epstein who brought a defamation suit against Ms. Maxwell in 2015, from which the perjury charge...

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
The Government government agency
Refers to the prosecution in the criminal case against Ms. Maxwell. The document critiques the government's legal the...

Timeline (4 events)

2007
Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement was executed.
2014-12
Accuser-1 filed a motion to join a lawsuit challenging the validity of Epstein’s Non-Prosecution Agreement.
2015
A defamation suit was brought against Ms. Maxwell by Accuser-1.
S.D.N.Y.
Ms. Maxwell gave two depositions in the defamation case where she allegedly lied, leading to Counts Five and Six of the indictment.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in the case citation for the defamation suit: [Accuser-1] v. Maxwell, 15-CV-07433 (RWS) (S.D.N.Y.).

Relationships (2)

Ms. Maxwell criminal conspiracy (alleged) Epstein
The document discusses the government's theory that Ms. Maxwell was Epstein's "'madam' and the principal facilitator of his sexual abuse scheme," and Accuser-1's allegation that she was a "primary co-conspirator."
Ms. Maxwell legal adversaries Accuser-1
Accuser-1 brought a defamation suit against Ms. Maxwell in 2015 after Maxwell denied Accuser-1's allegations.

Key Quotes (4)

"broader investigation into Epstein’s sexual abuse of minors"
Source
— The government (Describing the scope of the government's investigation where it interviewed numerous alleged victims.)
DOJ-OGR-00001797.jpg
Quote #1
"madam"
Source
— The government (theory) (Used to describe the government's theory of Ms. Maxwell's role as Epstein's "'madam' and the principal facilitator of his sexual abuse scheme.")
DOJ-OGR-00001797.jpg
Quote #2
"post-date the time period charged in the Indictment"
Source
— The government (The government's argument for why materials related to abuse after 1997 are irrelevant to the charges.)
DOJ-OGR-00001797.jpg
Quote #3
"described Maxwell’s role as one of the main women who Epstein used to procure under-aged girls for sexual activities and a primary co-conspirator and participant in his sexual abuse and sex trafficking scheme."
Source
— Accuser-1's motion (A quote from Accuser-1's December 2014 motion, which Ms. Maxwell's public denial of led to the defamation suit.)
DOJ-OGR-00001797.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document