DOJ-OGR-00017003.jpg
589 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
589 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between two attorneys, Mr. Rohrbach and Mr. Everdell, and the judge. The discussion centers on the precise wording of a jury instruction concerning "uncalled witnesses," with Mr. Everdell proposing a modification and Mr. Rohrbach defending the standard instruction used in the district.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney |
Speaker in a court proceeding, arguing about a jury instruction for an "uncalled witness".
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
Speaker in a court proceeding, proposing an alternative wording for a jury instruction.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in a court proceeding, presiding over the discussion on jury instructions.
|
| Sand |
Mentioned as having suggested the jury instruction being discussed.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned as the entity that chose not to call or immunize certain co-conspirators.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion took place in court regarding the wording of a jury instruction about uncalled witnesses.
A court in an unspecified district.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Refers to the legal district where the case is being prosecuted, likely the Southern District based on the reporters'...
|
Relationships (3)
Both are attorneys participating in the same court proceeding, presenting opposing or differing viewpoints on a legal matter to the judge.
Mr. Rohrbach is addressing the Court (the judge) to argue a legal point during a proceeding.
Mr. Everdell is addressing the Court (the judge) to propose an alternative legal instruction during a proceeding.
Key Quotes (2)
"If we can just eliminate the language in the title of the charge that says "equally available to both sides" and just have "the uncalled witnesses.""Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Proposing an alternative wording for a jury instruction to the Court.)
DOJ-OGR-00017003.jpg
Quote #1
"This is the uncalled witness instruction, your Honor. This is the instruction given, suggested by Sand and given by this Court."Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Arguing in favor of using the standard jury instruction.)
DOJ-OGR-00017003.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document