DOJ-OGR-00013220.jpg
591 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
591 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between two attorneys, Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca, in front of a judge. The discussion focuses on whether omissions in a legal complaint regarding specific sex acts are inconsistent with a witness's testimony. The judge concludes that the testified detail is significant and sustains an objection related to the matter.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Mentioned in the header 'Carolyn - cross', indicating she is the witness whose testimony is being discussed during cr...
|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, arguing that a witness's testimony is not inconsistent with a legal complaint and that o...
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, arguing against Ms. Comey's position and asserting that the details in question are sign...
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
The presiding judge in the proceeding, addressed as 'your Honor', who listens to the arguments and makes a ruling.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the document; the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A legal argument occurred between attorneys Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca before a judge regarding the significance of details omitted from a legal complaint when compared to a witness's testimony about sex acts.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (3)
They are opposing counsel in a legal proceeding, with Mr. Pagliuca explicitly disagreeing with Ms. Comey's argument.
Ms. Comey is an attorney presenting an argument to the presiding judge, whom she addresses as 'your Honor'.
Mr. Pagliuca is an attorney presenting a counter-argument to the presiding judge, whom he addresses as 'your Honor'.
Key Quotes (4)
"It is not necessarily the case that in order to make out the legal claims in this complaint, that a lawyer would have needed to include anything other than fondling and masturbation."Source
— MS. COMEY
(Arguing that the omission of other sex acts from a legal complaint is not a fatal flaw or inconsistency.)
DOJ-OGR-00013220.jpg
Quote #1
"I disagree, your Honor."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Directly opposing the argument made by Ms. Comey.)
DOJ-OGR-00013220.jpg
Quote #2
"I mean, Ms. Comey doesn't do civil work, but it is significant. And it is significant for many reasons."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Countering Ms. Comey's argument by asserting the significance of the details and questioning her relevant experience.)
DOJ-OGR-00013220.jpg
Quote #3
"The one detail that was testified to is a significant detail. So with respect to 39, I'll overrule. Sorry, I'll sustain."Source
— THE COURT
(Making a final ruling on the argument, agreeing that the detail is significant and sustaining the objection.)
DOJ-OGR-00013220.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document