DOJ-OGR-00008333.jpg
618 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
618 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on December 10, 2021. Attorneys Ms. Menninger and Mr. Rohrbach are arguing before the court about the nature of a witness, Mr. Flatley. The central issue is whether Mr. Flatley will testify as a fact witness or an expert witness regarding his methods for user data extraction, and whether sufficient notice was provided to the opposing side.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Flatley | Witness |
Subject of a discussion about whether he is a fact witness or an expert witness regarding the extraction of user data...
|
| Mr. Kelso | Witness |
Mentioned as a point of comparison for Mr. Flatley's potential testimony.
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, arguing that the government has not provided sufficient notice about the nature of Mr. Fla...
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, questioning whether Mr. Flatley is being used as an expert witness.
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, responding to the court that Mr. Flatley is primarily a fact witness but that they have gi...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned as the entity providing '3500 material' and identifying evidence.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-12-10
A discussion in court regarding the nature of Mr. Flatley's testimony, specifically whether he is a fact witness or an expert witness, and if proper notice was provided for his testimony on data extraction.
Courtroom
Relationships (3)
They are opposing counsel in a legal proceeding, arguing different positions before the court regarding the testimony of a witness, Mr. Flatley.
Ms. Menninger is an attorney addressing the judge ('Your Honor') to make a legal argument.
Mr. Rohrbach is an attorney responding to a direct question from the judge.
Key Quotes (3)
"Your Honor, the 3500 material doesn't say Mr. Flatley is going to describe the extraction of user data this way."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Arguing that the provided discovery materials do not adequately describe the scope of Mr. Flatley's expected testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00008333.jpg
Quote #1
"Well, I have to go back and look at the notice. But are you using Flatley as an expert?"Source
— THE COURT
(Questioning the legal team about the classification of their witness, Mr. Flatley.)
DOJ-OGR-00008333.jpg
Quote #2
"We think Mr. Flatley is primarily a fact witness, but the line between a fact witness in a setting like this and someone testifying on the basis of their expertise is not well settled, and so we've given expert notice"Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Explaining their position on Mr. Flatley's role, acknowledging the ambiguity between a fact and expert witness in this context.)
DOJ-OGR-00008333.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document