DOJ-OGR-00013488.jpg

506 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 506 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. An attorney questions Rodgers about his certainty regarding the presence of a passenger named "Jane" on a flight, establishing that Rodgers cannot definitively say whether she was on board. Rodgers admits he could have been given a name for the flight manifest without ever meeting the person, and that the person he knows with that name could not have been the passenger in question.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Rodgers Witness
The person being cross-examined, as indicated by the header "Rodgers - cross" and their answers prefixed with "A."
Jane Passenger (potential)
A person being discussed, whose presence on a flight is in question. The name is referred to as a first name only.
Epstein
Mentioned in the context of his "world," suggesting a social or professional circle to which people with the first na...

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.

Timeline (2 events)

2003-09
Rodgers met a person with the same first name as 'Jane'.
Rodgers unnamed person
2022-08-10
Cross-examination of witness Rodgers in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Rodgers Unnamed Questioner

Relationships (2)

Rodgers professional Jane
Rodgers discusses the possibility of having flown a passenger named Jane, but is uncertain if he ever met her or if she was on a specific flight. The relationship is that of a potential pilot to a potential passenger.
Jane social/professional Epstein
The questioner suggests there were potentially many people with the first name 'Jane' in "Epstein's world," implying a connection between them.

Key Quotes (3)

"I've only flown two persons with that name, and the second person I saw a picture of I met in September of 2003. So it couldn't have been her."
Source
— Rodgers (Responding to a question about whether he knew if Jane was on a specific flight.)
DOJ-OGR-00013488.jpg
Quote #1
"You could have been given the name of Jane's true first name as a passenger and never met that person; correct?"
Source
— Unnamed Questioner (Posing a hypothetical scenario to the witness about how a name could appear on a flight manifest without the witness having met the individual.)
DOJ-OGR-00013488.jpg
Quote #2
"Possibly."
Source
— Rodgers (Answering whether it's possible he might not have met the person on the flight who was actually going by Jane's true first name.)
DOJ-OGR-00013488.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document