DOJ-OGR-00018991.jpg

528 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 528 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between the judge, defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca, and government attorney Ms. Comey. The discussion centers on the procedural issue of raising a new argument that was not addressed during a witness's examination, specifically in relation to the testimony of Mr. Alessi. The judge explains their position while affirming they will keep an open mind to future arguments from both sides before the court goes into recess.

People (5)

Name Role Context
THE COURT Judge
Speaker in the transcript, presiding over the case.
MR. PAGLIUCA Attorney (Defense)
Speaker in the transcript, addressing the court on behalf of the defense.
Mr. Alessi Witness
Mentioned in the context of his prior testimony.
MS. COMEY Attorney (Government)
Speaker in the transcript, addressing the court on behalf of the government.
Rodgers Witness
Mentioned in the header of the transcript page, indicating the context of the testimony is a direct examination of Ro...

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-10
A colloquy between the judge and counsel for the defense and government regarding the introduction of a new argument. The hearing concludes with a recess.
Courtroom
The court proceeding took a recess.
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."

Relationships (3)

MR. PAGLIUCA professional THE COURT
Mr. Pagliuca addresses the judge as 'Your Honor' and engages in legal discussion.
MS. COMEY professional THE COURT
Ms. Comey addresses the judge as 'Your Honor' and speaks on behalf of the government.
MR. PAGLIUCA professional (adversarial) MS. COMEY
They represent opposing sides in the legal case, the 'defense' and the 'government' respectively.

Key Quotes (4)

"Having not admitted it pending what all along had been the government's proffer as to the anticipated testimony of an anticipated witness, I didn't admit it following Mr. Alessi's testimony."
Source
— THE COURT (Explaining the reasoning for not admitting a particular argument or piece of evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00018991.jpg
Quote #1
"I'm open to arguments. Obviously, both sides have reargued many issues and I keep an open mind."
Source
— THE COURT (Stating their willingness to hear further arguments from both the prosecution and defense.)
DOJ-OGR-00018991.jpg
Quote #2
"Not from the government, your Honor."
Source
— MS. COMEY (Responding to the judge's question 'Anything else?')
DOJ-OGR-00018991.jpg
Quote #3
"Nothing from the defense, your Honor."
Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA (Responding to the judge's question 'Anything else?')
DOJ-OGR-00018991.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document