DOJ-OGR-00021861.jpg

671 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

1
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal opinion / appellate court decision
File Size: 671 KB
Summary

This document is page 14 of a legal opinion (likely from an appellate court given the 'we review de novo' language) addressing Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal. The court affirms the District Court's denial of Maxwell's motion to dismiss charges based on the statute of limitations. The text analyzes 18 U.S.C. § 3283 regarding offenses involving the sexual abuse of minors and cites case law such as Weingarten v. United States.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant/Appellant
Arguing that counts in her indictment were untimely; motion to dismiss was denied.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
District Court
Denied Maxwell's motions to dismiss charges.
United States Government
Opposing party in the legal case.
Congress
Mentioned regarding intent of 18 U.S.C. § 3283.
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated in footer stamp).
2d Cir.
Second Circuit Court of Appeals, cited in footnotes.

Timeline (2 events)

2003
Amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283 enacted
USA
2021
United States v. Maxwell District Court decision
S.D.N.Y.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Southern District of New York (cited in footnote 21).

Relationships (1)

Maxwell is appealing the indictment brought by the Government.

Key Quotes (4)

"The District Court therefore correctly denied Maxwell’s motion without an evidentiary hearing."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021861.jpg
Quote #1
"Maxwell argues that Counts Three and Four of the Indictment are untimely because they do not fall within the scope of offenses involving the sexual or physical abuse or kidnapping of a minor"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021861.jpg
Quote #2
"On both points, we disagree and hold that the District Court correctly denied Maxwell’s motions to dismiss the charges as untimely."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021861.jpg
Quote #3
"“[n]o statute of limitations that would otherwise preclude prosecution for an offense involving the sexual or physical abuse, or kidnaping, of a child under the age of 18 years shall preclude such prosecution during the life of the child, or for ten years after the offense, whichever is longer.”"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021861.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document