DOJ-OGR-00017316.jpg

633 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 633 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument about the purpose of travel undertaken by a person named Jane. An unnamed speaker argues that Jane's return trip from New Mexico was not for illicit sexual activity because Mr. Epstein was not present, while another speaker, Ms. Moe, counters that the evidence is ambiguous as to which flight is being discussed. The conversation centers on interpreting Jane's intent and whether her travel meets the elements of a crime.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Jane Subject of testimony
Mentioned as the person who traveled across state lines, specifically to and from New Mexico. Her testimony and the p...
Mr. Epstein
Mentioned in the context of a return trip Jane took. The speaker notes that Mr. Epstein wasn't present on this return...
MS. MOE Speaker (likely an attorney)
A speaker in the transcript who addresses the judge ('Your Honor') to argue about the clarity of a note concerning fl...
Your Honor Judge
Addressed by MS. MOE, indicating the presence of a judge in the proceedings.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.

Timeline (3 events)

2022-08-10
A court hearing where the purpose and motivation behind Jane's travel were debated.
MS. MOE Your Honor Unnamed Speaker
Jane traveled to New Mexico, allegedly for the purpose of engaging in sexual activity.
New Mexico
Jane took a return trip from New Mexico, during which Mr. Epstein was not present.
New Mexico

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned as the destination of a flight and the origin of a return flight taken by Jane.

Relationships (2)

Jane unspecified Mr. Epstein
The document discusses Jane's travel in relation to Mr. Epstein's presence. It mentions Jane's testimony that she went to New Mexico to engage in sexual activity, and that Mr. Epstein was presumably in New Mexico when she left, but was not present on her return trip.
MS. MOE professional Your Honor
MS. MOE directly addresses 'Your Honor' in a formal court setting.

Key Quotes (3)

"There is no significant or motivating purpose of a return trip where Mr. Epstein wasn't present; it's just a return trip from New Mexico."
Source
— Unnamed Speaker (Arguing that Jane's return travel lacked the illicit purpose required for the crime being discussed.)
DOJ-OGR-00017316.jpg
Quote #1
"The testimony, if we are to believe it, is that she went to New Mexico for some purpose to engage in sexual activity, that's if you believe Jane's testimony."
Source
— Unnamed Speaker (Referencing Jane's own testimony about the purpose of her initial trip to New Mexico.)
DOJ-OGR-00017316.jpg
Quote #2
"Your Honor, I don't believe this note is that clear about what flight we're talking about."
Source
— MS. MOE (Objecting to the previous speaker's argument by pointing out ambiguity in the evidence (a note) regarding which of Jane's flights is being discussed.)
DOJ-OGR-00017316.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document