DOJ-OGR-00018054.jpg

589 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 589 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between attorneys Ms. Comey, Mr. Pagliuca, and the presiding judge. The parties agree on a method for admitting exhibit 52 into evidence, deciding to use a redacted version consisting of specific pages (52A, D, E, F, G, H) for the jury. The agreement clarifies that the exhibit will be authenticated and admitted in this limited form.

People (4)

Name Role Context
MS. COMEY Attorney
Speaking on behalf of a party, proposing to admit a narrowed, five-page version of exhibit 52 into evidence.
THE COURT Judge
Presiding over the legal proceeding, questioning the attorneys and ruling on the admission of evidence.
Mr. Pagliuca Attorney
Mentioned by Ms. Comey and speaks to the court, clarifying the procedure for admitting a redacted version of exhibit 52.
Alessi Unknown
Mentioned in the header of the transcript, possibly a witness under direct examination ("Alessi - Direct").

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service that transcribed the proceeding.
DOJ Government agency
Appears as a prefix in the document control number (DOJ-OGR-00018054), suggesting Department of Justice involvement.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
A discussion was held to determine the procedure for admitting exhibit 52 into evidence. It was agreed that a redacted version of the exhibit would be authenticated and admitted for the jury.
Courtroom
MS. COMEY MR. PAGLIUCA THE COURT

Relationships (3)

MS. COMEY Professional THE COURT
Ms. Comey addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and presents legal arguments and proposals regarding evidence.
MR. PAGLIUCA Professional THE COURT
Mr. Pagliuca addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and collaborates on establishing a clear record for an evidentiary ruling.
MS. COMEY Professional MR. PAGLIUCA
They are both attorneys in the same legal proceeding, discussing and agreeing upon the handling of evidence proposed by one of their parties.

Key Quotes (4)

"Your Honor, we're not offering the entirety of 52. As I believe we mentioned to your Honor in briefing, we're trying to narrow what we're offering from this exhibit, and so we picked five pages that are particularly relevant to the facts that are at issue in this case..."
Source
— MS. COMEY (Explaining the proposal to admit only a portion of exhibit 52.)
DOJ-OGR-00018054.jpg
Quote #1
"So the record will be clear that 52, if the Court is going to allow it, is authenticated and admitted, and that it's a redacted version of 52 is what's going to the jury."
Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA (Summarizing the agreement for the official court record.)
DOJ-OGR-00018054.jpg
Quote #2
"That sounds exactly right."
Source
— THE COURT (Confirming and agreeing with Mr. Pagliuca's summary of the procedure.)
DOJ-OGR-00018054.jpg
Quote #3
"It's 52A, D, E, F, G and H."
Source
— MS. COMEY (Specifying which subpages of exhibit 52 will be admitted into evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00018054.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document