DOJ-OGR-00021562.jpg
524 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
524 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (specifically page 17 of the session, page 132 of the filing) involving a discussion between an attorney, Mr. Everdell, and the Judge regarding sentencing procedures. The Judge confirms the rejection of a redaction request and states that testimony from an individual named 'Kate' is relevant to the sentencing. The parties agree to delay arguments regarding offense level calculations and financial penalties until a later point in the proceeding.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Discussing objections to sentencing calculations and financial penalties with the judge.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, ruling on redactions, and managing the order of objections.
|
| Kate | Witness/Victim |
Mentioned by the Court; her testimony and statement are deemed relevant to sentencing.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer attribution.
|
|
| Probation |
Mentioned as having responded to requests and assertions.
|
|
| The Government |
Mentioned by Mr. Everdell regarding representations made in their response.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the court reporter's name and area code (likely SDNY).
|
Relationships (1)
Standard courtroom dialogue structure.
Key Quotes (4)
"So I did reject the request for redactions for the reasons explained in my order."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021562.jpg
Quote #1
"Kate's testimony and her statement are relevant to sentencing which I've indicated she may give."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021562.jpg
Quote #2
"So we'll delay the offense level calculation objections and the ones related to the financial penalties for now?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021562.jpg
Quote #3
"The government made in their response some representations that we take issue with"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021562.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document