DOJ-OGR-00009272.jpg
1.01 MB
Extraction Summary
8
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
1.01 MB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of U.S. v. Paul M. Daugerdas. It captures the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad, who is questioned about receiving use immunity and the possibility of facing perjury charges. The transcript culminates with the judge directly questioning Ms. Conrad about why she admittedly lied and perjured herself during the jury selection (voir dire) process, to which she responds it was for the 'interesting trial experience'.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| PAUL M. DAUGERDAS | Defendant |
Named in the case title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.
|
| Conrad | Witness |
The person being cross-examined throughout the transcript. Referred to as 'Ms. Conrad' by the Court.
|
| MR. OKULA | Attorney |
An attorney present in the courtroom, making objections on behalf of his client.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
The presiding judge in the hearing, ruling on objections and questioning the witness directly.
|
| MR. SHECHTMAN | Attorney |
An attorney who states he has 'No further questions' on page 236.
|
| Mr. Rotert | Attorney |
An attorney who declines to ask further questions on redirect on page 236.
|
| Ms. McCarthy | Attorney |
An attorney who is asked if she has further questions on redirect and states 'Nothing further' on page 236.
|
| Ms. Guerin |
Mentioned by Mr. Rotert who says he has 'nothing for Ms. Guerin' on page 236.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | government agency |
The plaintiff in the case, also referred to as 'the government'.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS | company |
The court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings, mentioned at the bottom of page 236.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2012-02-15
Cross-examination of witness Ms. Conrad regarding her testimony, use immunity, and admitted perjury during the voir dire process.
Southern District
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned by the witness, Ms. Conrad, as the location of the court proceedings: 'But we're sitting here in the Southe...
|
Relationships (3)
The document shows the judge directly questioning the witness, Ms. Conrad, about her admitted perjury, indicating a formal, authoritative interaction within a legal proceeding.
The transcript is a cross-examination where the attorney questions Ms. Conrad's credibility, her understanding of immunity, and the potential for perjury charges against her.
The case title 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,' establishes them as the plaintiff and defendant in a criminal case.
Key Quotes (4)
"The judge didn't confer immunity until I invoked my Fifth Amendment privilege."Source
— Conrad
(Explaining the timing and circumstances under which she received use immunity.)
DOJ-OGR-00009272.jpg
Quote #1
"You're quoting from my letter. I don't know who else's government it would be. But we're sitting here in the Southern District, so kudos, I guess you're correct."Source
— Conrad
(Responding to a question about her use of the phrase 'our government' in a letter she wrote.)
DOJ-OGR-00009272.jpg
Quote #2
"Ms. Conrad, I would like to ask you, given your acknowledgment here today that you misrepresented any number of material things about yourself during voir dire to make yourself marketable for the jury, and you perjured yourself, why did you do that?"Source
— THE COURT
(The judge directly questioning the witness about her admitted perjury during jury selection.)
DOJ-OGR-00009272.jpg
Quote #3
"As I had mentioned, I knew I could be a fair, unbiased juror, and substantivelywise it seemed as if it would be an interesting trial experience. And having been suspended for so long, I guess mentally I would think maybe I'm back in the swing of things now."Source
— THE WITNESS (Conrad)
(Explaining her motivation for lying and perjuring herself during the voir dire process.)
DOJ-OGR-00009272.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document