DOJ-OGR-00009484.jpg
481 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
481 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from February 24, 2022, in which an attorney argues before a judge. The attorney contends that the opposing counsel's failure to properly investigate a witness was not a strategic tactic ('sandbagging') but rather incompetence, carelessness, and an oversight, quoting the Second Circuit's language. The speaker believes this failure to act constitutes prejudice and that the opposing side "dropped the ball."
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Nardello |
Mentioned in the context of the "Nardello firm," which could have been hired to investigate.
|
|
| your Honor | Judge |
The speaker is addressing the judge directly throughout the transcript.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Nardello firm | company |
An entity that could have been hired to "investigate more."
|
| the Court | government agency |
Referenced multiple times as the judicial body hearing the case.
|
| the Second Circuit | government agency |
A higher court whose words ("oversight," "careless," "inept") are being quoted by the speaker.
|
| the government | government agency |
Mentioned as a party in the legal proceedings that "doesn't argue sandbagging."
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-02-24
An attorney is presenting an oral argument to a judge in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Southern District Court
Unnamed counsel
Judge
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Identified as the location of the court reporters, likely referring to a U.S. Federal Judicial District.
|
Relationships (1)
Unnamed counsel
→
professional
→
Judge ('your Honor')
The document is a transcript of the counsel making a legal argument directly to the judge in a formal court setting.
Key Quotes (3)
"Because as crazy as this woman was, I've always thought if your Honor brought her out and said are you the same person, I'm not sure her lying would have gone that far."Source
— Unnamed counsel
(The speaker is speculating that confronting a witness in court would have exposed her dishonesty.)
DOJ-OGR-00009484.jpg
Quote #1
"They didn't do it because, to use the Second Circuit's word, it was an oversight, it was careless, it was inept."Source
— Unnamed counsel
(The speaker is characterizing the opposing counsel's failure to act as incompetence rather than a deliberate legal strategy.)
DOJ-OGR-00009484.jpg
Quote #2
"I think your Honor's findings are that these people really dropped the ball, and they failed to do what they"Source
— Unnamed counsel
(The speaker is summarizing their interpretation of the judge's view on the opposing counsel's performance.)
DOJ-OGR-00009484.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document