DOJ-OGR-00021023.jpg

639 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 639 KB
Summary

This legal document is a court's analysis of a defendant's claim that missing evidence—such as financial records, phone records, and flight manifests—was prejudicial to her case. The court rejects this argument, stating the defendant failed to demonstrate what the absent documents would have shown or how they would have been beneficial, concluding the claims are purely speculative. The court notes that the missing evidence could just as easily have further substantiated the government's case.

People (4)

Name Role Context
the Countess
Mentioned as the person who allegedly created a household manual, not the Defendant.
Lynn Fontanilla live-in housekeeper for Epstein
Identified as a potential witness who could have testified about the Defendant's and Epstein's habits.
Epstein
Mentioned in relation to his housekeeper (Lynn Fontanilla), his habits, his residences, and potential payments to the...
Defendant Defendant
The subject of the legal filing, arguing that missing evidence caused prejudice to her case. Mentioned throughout the...

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
The Court Judicial body
Mentioned as addressing the Defendant's arguments about documentary evidence.
Government Government agency
Mentioned as having elicited testimony at trial and whose case may have been substantiated by the missing evidence.

Timeline (2 events)

2001-09-11
The date is used as a reference point for the level of detail in flight manifests, with those from before this date being 'far less detailed'.
The Government elicited testimony during a trial regarding the level of detail in flight manifests from before September 11, 2001.

Locations (1)

Location Context
The location where Lynn Fontanilla was a live-in housekeeper for Epstein.

Relationships (2)

Lynn Fontanilla Professional Epstein
Lynn Fontanilla is described as a 'live-in housekeeper for Epstein in New York'.
Defendant Associates Epstein
The document discusses their shared 'habits', potential 'payments by Epstein to the Defendant', and Epstein's residences in the context of the Defendant's case.

Key Quotes (1)

"the Countess"
Source
— Unknown (attributed) (The document states that a witness could have testified that the household manual was created by 'the Countess,' not the Defendant.)
DOJ-OGR-00021023.jpg
Quote #1

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document