DOJ-OGR-00013573.jpg
484 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
484 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Chapell. The questioning focuses on an invoice and two shipments that occurred on October 7, 2002, one of which was sent by Cecilia Steen. The questioner also makes a point to establish that Cecilia Steen and Ghislaine Maxwell are not the same person.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Chapell | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the person being cross-examined. Designated as 'A' (Answer) in the transcript.
|
| Cecilia Steen | Sender of a package |
Mentioned as the sender of a package on October 7th, 2002, as detailed on an invoice being discussed.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell |
Mentioned to clarify that she is not the same person as Cecilia Steen.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2002-10-07
A shipment was picked up, as noted on an invoice. This occurred on the same day as another package sent by Cecilia Steen.
Relationships (1)
The document explicitly states through a question that Cecilia Steen is not Ghislaine Maxwell, indicating they are two separate individuals.
Key Quotes (2)
"That sender says that the package was sent by Cecilia Steen; correct?"Source
— Q (Questioner)
(The questioner is confirming the identity of the sender of a package listed on an invoice.)
DOJ-OGR-00013573.jpg
Quote #1
"It goes without saying that Cecilia Steen is not Ghislaine Maxwell; correct?"Source
— Q (Questioner)
(The questioner is establishing for the record that two individuals are distinct people.)
DOJ-OGR-00013573.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document