DOJ-OGR-00016766.jpg
634 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
634 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a legal argument between a judge and an attorney, Mr. Everdell. The judge warns Mr. Everdell that his intended line of questioning for a witness—focusing on what the government didn't do—would violate a prior court order. Mr. Everdell defends his approach as an attempt to elicit evidence about the absence of evidence, but the judge reiterates that the jury's role is to evaluate the evidence the government did present.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, clarifying a prior order and explaining the role of the jury.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, arguing for a line of questioning and responding to the Court's concerns.
|
| your Honor | Judge |
Title used by Mr. Everdell to address the Court.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
| government | government agency |
Referred to as the entity presenting evidence in the case, likely the prosecution.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion between the Court (judge) and an attorney (Mr. Everdell) regarding a proposed line of questioning and whether it violates a prior in limine order.
Southern District
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
Relationships (1)
The document is a transcript of a formal legal discussion between a judge (The Court) and an attorney (Mr. Everdell) regarding the rules of evidence and court orders during a trial.
Key Quotes (3)
"...asking the agent what she did or didn't do, which is precisely a violation of my order."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge explaining why a certain line of questioning would be impermissible.)
DOJ-OGR-00016766.jpg
Quote #1
"The question for the jury is, does the evidence that the government put on, that they deemed credible, prove beyond a reasonable doubt or not the charges."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge defining the central question for the jury and the basis for the in limine holding.)
DOJ-OGR-00016766.jpg
Quote #2
"I'm not trying to violate this, which is why we're discussing this, your Honor. I just thought there was some room to be able to elicit evidence about the absence of evidence rather than just argument to the jury, and that's what I was intending to do with this witness."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(The attorney explaining his rationale for the proposed line of questioning to the judge.)
DOJ-OGR-00016766.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document