DOJ-OGR-00001461.jpg

754 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
4
Organizations
3
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 754 KB
Summary

This legal document, part of a court filing, refutes claims made by an inmate named Maxwell regarding her conditions of confinement at the MDC. It distinguishes her situation from a case involving Tiffany Days, who experienced sewage flooding at a different facility (the MCC), and argues there is no evidence of such issues at the MDC. The document also counters Maxwell's claim of being in "solitary confinement" by detailing her daily access to a day room and various amenities for thirteen hours.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Maxwell Inmate/Defendant
Subject of the document, whose complaints about incarceration conditions are being addressed.
Tiffany Days Party in a separate legal case
Her case is cited by Maxwell as an example of sewage flooding, though it occurred at a different facility (MCC).
Judge Nathan Judge
The judge before whom Maxwell is advised to raise her complaints about discovery review.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Metropolitan Correctional Center Correctional facility
Referred to as "MCC", it is the location where Tiffany Days experienced sewage flooding.
MDC Correctional facility
The facility where Maxwell is incarcerated. The document argues there is no evidence of flooding at this location.
District Court Judicial body
The court where Maxwell should seek relief for issues interfering with her trial preparation.
Government Government agency
Mentioned in a footnote as having worked with the MDC to ensure Maxwell has ample resources.

Timeline (2 events)

2021-04-29
Sentencing hearing in the case of United States v. Days, where incidents experienced by Tiffany Days at the MCC were described.
S.D.N.Y.
Maxwell's incarceration at the MDC, during which she has made complaints about her conditions.
MDC

Locations (3)

Location Context
Location of flooding in the Tiffany Days case.
MDC
Location of Maxwell's incarceration.
Southern District of New York, the jurisdiction for the United States v. Days case.

Relationships (1)

Maxwell Legal (Defendant-Judge) Judge Nathan
The document states that Maxwell's complaints about discovery should be raised before Judge Nathan.

Key Quotes (1)

"in solitary confinement"
Source
— Maxwell (A quote from Maxwell's complaint (Mot. at 3) describing her housing situation, which the document argues is inaccurate.)
DOJ-OGR-00001461.jpg
Quote #1

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document