DOJ-OGR-00009426.jpg
446 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
446 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on February 24, 2012, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Schoeman. An attorney questions Schoeman on whether his analysis regarding Juror No. 1 would have been improved by knowing the juror was a suspended attorney. Schoeman defends his conclusion based on the information he had, but concedes that matching names and middle initials make it statistically likely two records refer to the same person.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Schoeman | Witness |
A witness undergoing cross-examination regarding an analysis he performed.
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
Mentioned in a question regarding whether this person was a suspended attorney.
|
| Catherine Conrad |
A name used in a hypothetical question about identifying individuals with the same name and middle initial.
|
|
| MR. OKULA | Attorney |
An attorney who addresses the judge at the end of the questioning.
|
| Judge | Judge |
Addressed by Mr. Okula, presiding over the proceeding.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Relationships (2)
The document shows an unnamed questioner conducting a cross-examination of the witness, Schoeman, in a legal proceeding.
Key Quotes (3)
"Would you have liked to receive that information in order to make a better assessment of your own about whether Juror No. 1 was the suspended attorney?"Source
— Unnamed Questioner
(Questioning the witness about the adequacy of the information he used for his analysis.)
DOJ-OGR-00009426.jpg
Quote #1
"I'm telling you that I reached a conclusion based on that information."Source
— Schoeman
(Responding to repeated questions about whether more information would have improved his analysis.)
DOJ-OGR-00009426.jpg
Quote #2
"Would you agree with me that if you have two people, one named Catherine Conrad, another named Catherine Conrad, and you were given information about their middle initials, that they share the same middle initial, that it made it statistically more likely that was the same person?"Source
— Unnamed Questioner
(Using a hypothetical scenario to establish a point about identifying individuals.)
DOJ-OGR-00009426.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document