DOJ-OGR-00013875.jpg
589 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
589 KB
Summary
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a discussion between a judge and attorneys about a proposed stipulation. The stipulation would establish the timing of ownership for a property at 44 Kinnerton, which would then be used to argue the credibility of testimonies from Ms. Maxwell and a witness named Kate regarding when Ms. Maxwell resided there.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the legal discussion, suggesting a stipulation regarding property ownership timing.
|
| Ms. Maxwell |
Subject of a deposition where she stated she lived at Kinnerton starting in '92 or '93. Her testimony is being discus...
|
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney |
Represents the government and indicates a probable agreement to the Court's proposed stipulation.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
An attorney in the proceeding who needs to confer with his team before agreeing to the stipulation.
|
| Kate | Witness |
A person whose testimony is being discussed as potentially inaccurate or false regarding when Ms. Maxwell lived at a ...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, listed at the bottom of the page.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion between the Court and attorneys about a potential stipulation regarding the ownership timing of 44 Kinnerton to address conflicting testimonies from Ms. Maxwell and a witness named Kate.
Courtroom
Ms. Maxwell gave a deposition stating she lived at Kinnerton beginning in '92 or '93.
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
A property whose ownership timing is the subject of a proposed stipulation.
|
|
|
The specific address of the Kinnerton property mentioned by the Court.
|
Relationships (3)
Mr. Rohrbach addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and participates in the legal discussion.
Mr. Everdell addresses the Court as 'Judge' and discusses legal matters in the proceeding.
Kate provided testimony regarding her belief about where Ms. Maxwell lived, suggesting some form of acquaintance or knowledge of her life.
Key Quotes (3)
"I think what makes sense here to talk about is a stipulation as to the timing of ownership of the Kinnerton -- 44 Kinnerton, the timing of ownership."Source
— THE COURT
(Proposing a method to handle conflicting information about property ownership and residency.)
DOJ-OGR-00013875.jpg
Quote #1
"It sounds like that gives you what you want, which was the fact of ownership timing from which you can argue to the jury that because she didn't own it until a certain date, she couldn't have lived there before that date."Source
— THE COURT
(Explaining the strategic advantage of the proposed stipulation to one of the legal parties.)
DOJ-OGR-00013875.jpg
Quote #2
"And you can then argue, therefore, Kate wasn't accurate or testified falsely or however you want to phrase it, that she believed Ms. Maxwell lived there prior to '97."Source
— THE COURT
(Outlining how the stipulation could be used to impeach the testimony of the witness, Kate.)
DOJ-OGR-00013875.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document