DOJ-OGR-00013636.jpg

604 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

7
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
5
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 604 KB
Summary

This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a legal argument over the admissibility of hearsay testimony during the direct examination of witness A. Farmer. Attorneys debate with the judge how to question the witness about why she was willing to see Jeffrey Epstein again, despite her discomfort, focusing on a conversation with her mother about Maxwell's presence. The discussion revolves around whether this testimony is offered for the truth of the matter asserted or to explain the witness's state of mind.

People (7)

Name Role Context
MS. MENNINGER Attorney (implied)
Speaker in the transcript, arguing about the admissibility of testimony regarding a conversation with 'the mother'.
MS. COMEY Attorney (implied)
Speaker in the transcript, clarifying that the purpose of testimony is to explain the witness's state of mind, not fo...
THE COURT Judge
Speaker in the transcript, ruling on the hearsay nature of the proposed testimony.
Jeffrey Epstein
Mentioned as the person the witness felt uncomfortable around but was willing to see again.
Maxwell
Mentioned by the Court as the person the witness's mother allegedly said would be present.
MS. MOE Attorney (implied)
Speaker in the transcript, proposing a line of questioning to avoid hearsay issues.
A. Farmer Witness
Identified in the header as the person under direct examination.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-10
A legal argument took place regarding the admissibility of testimony under hearsay rules during the direct examination of witness A. Farmer.
Courtroom
The witness (A. Farmer) traveled to New Mexico.
New Mexico

Locations (1)

Location Context
A location the witness traveled to, which is a subject of the questioning.

Relationships (5)

Witness (A. Farmer) Acquaintance (negative) Jeffrey Epstein
The transcript states the witness 'felt uncomfortable around Jeffrey Epstein; and that she knew something was wrong'.
Witness (A. Farmer) Acquaintance (implied) Maxwell
The court suggests the attorneys want to introduce testimony that the witness's mother told her Maxwell would be present at a location with Epstein.
MS. MENNINGER Professional THE COURT
Ms. Menninger addresses the judge as 'Your Honor' during a legal proceeding.
MS. COMEY Professional THE COURT
Ms. Comey addresses the judge as 'Your Honor' during a legal proceeding.
MS. MOE Professional THE COURT
Ms. Moe addresses the judge as 'Your Honor' during a legal proceeding.

Key Quotes (3)

"Your Honor, just to clarify, the jury just heard this witness say she felt uncomfortable around Jeffrey Epstein; and that she knew something was wrong. The point of this is not to give the truth of what the mother said, but to explain why she was willing to go back to see Jeffrey Epstein again."
Source
— MS. COMEY (Arguing that the testimony about a conversation with the witness's mother should be admitted to show the witness's state of mind, not for the truth of the matter asserted.)
DOJ-OGR-00013636.jpg
Quote #1
"You're trying to elicit that her mother told her that Maxwell would be there, which is for the truth and hearsay."
Source
— THE COURT (The judge's interpretation of the proposed testimony, identifying it as hearsay.)
DOJ-OGR-00013636.jpg
Quote #2
"I think the questions would be, Did you feel comfortable going to New Mexico? Why did you feel comfortable going to New Mexico? And then we wouldn't object to a limiting instruction."
Source
— MS. MOE (Proposing an alternative line of questioning to avoid the hearsay objection while still exploring the witness's motivations.)
DOJ-OGR-00013636.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document