DOJ-OGR-00011548.jpg

641 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 641 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on July 22, 2022, detailing a legal argument between a government representative, Ms. Moe, and the Court. The discussion focuses on establishing the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, as an 'organizer or leader' for sentencing purposes by proving she exercised a supervisory role over at least one other criminally responsible participant. The government specifically identifies Sarah Kellen as the individual supervised by Ms. Maxwell, based on evidence from the trial.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell Defendant
Mentioned as the defendant who allegedly exercised a supervisory or leadership role over another person in a criminal...
MS. MOE Government representative (likely prosecutor)
A speaker in the transcript, arguing the government's position that the defendant had a supervisory role over Sarah K...
Sarah Kellen Participant
Identified as the person over whom Ms. Maxwell allegedly had a supervisory role, and who is considered a 'criminally ...
your Honor Judge
Addressed by MS. MOE, referring to the judge presiding over the case.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Second Circuit government agency
Mentioned in the context of legal precedent regarding the application of a sentencing factor.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR government agency
Part of the document identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00011548', likely referring to the Department of Justice.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-07-22
A discussion during a court proceeding about whether the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, qualifies as an 'organizer or leader' under sentencing guidelines due to her supervisory role over Sarah Kellen.
Southern District Court (implied)
MS. MOE THE COURT

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.'

Relationships (1)

Ms. Maxwell supervisory Sarah Kellen
The government argues that 'the trial evidence establishes that the defendant had a supervisory role over Sarah Kellen' and that 'the defendant supervised at least one other person'.

Key Quotes (2)

"Yes, your Honor. As we noted in our briefing, our view is that the trial evidence establishes that the defendant had a supervisory role over Sarah Kellen."
Source
— MS. MOE (Responding to the Court's question and affirming the government's position on the defendant's leadership role.)
DOJ-OGR-00011548.jpg
Quote #1
"And the government is pointing to Sarah Kellen for that conclusion, which you agree, there has to be one criminally responsible participant who we can point to."
Source
— THE COURT (Summarizing and confirming the government's legal argument that Sarah Kellen fulfills the requirement of a supervised participant.)
DOJ-OGR-00011548.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document