EFTA00019119.pdf
225 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain / legal correspondence
File Size:
225 KB
Summary
This document is an email chain between defense attorneys (Cassidy, Necheles, Guha) and federal prosecutors (names redacted) spanning September to November 2020. The correspondence involves scheduling calls and discussing legal interpretations of 18 U.S.C. § 1510 and § 1512(b)(3) regarding witness tampering and obstruction. The prosecution provided a 'preliminary statement of facts' to explore a potential resolution, explicitly clarifying that it was not a plea offer.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Kathleen E. Cassidy | Defense Attorney |
Primary correspondent for the defense team, scheduling calls and drafting responses.
|
| Susan Necheles | Defense Attorney |
CC'd on emails; known counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Samidh Guha | Defense Attorney |
CC'd on emails.
|
| [Redacted Senders] | Federal Prosecutors |
Representing the government (USANYS), discussing legal statutes and potential resolutions.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USANYS |
United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (indicated by email metadata).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-10-19
Government sends 'preliminary statement of facts' to defense counsel to discuss potential resolution.
Email correspondence
US Attorney's Office
Defense Counsel (Cassidy, Guha, Necheles)
Relationships (2)
Both listed as recipients/CC on defense side of email chain.
Both listed as recipients/CC on defense side of email chain.
Key Quotes (4)
"As we’ve discussed, this isn’t a plea offer, and we don’t intend to issue a plea offer before notifying and consulting with victims."Source
EFTA00019119.pdf
Quote #1
"Section 1510 requires proof that the defendant knew the relevant law enforcement official was in fact a federal law enforcement official."Source
EFTA00019119.pdf
Quote #2
"By contrast, as we have discussed, Section 1512(b)(3) has no such requirement."Source
EFTA00019119.pdf
Quote #3
"However, we wanted to have a starting point so that we could have more concrete discussions with you about whether a resolution is possible here."Source
EFTA00019119.pdf
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document