DOJ-OGR-00000335.jpg

1.13 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing (government memorandum in opposition to bail/release)
File Size: 1.13 MB
Summary

This document is page 7 of a government filing opposing Jeffrey Epstein's release on bail, dated July 12, 2019. The prosecution argues that the proposed co-signers (Epstein's brother and a friend, Mr. Mitchell) are insufficient because Epstein could easily financially compensate them for any losses incurred if he fled. Additionally, the government asserts that Epstein's offer to sign a waiver of extradition is legally unenforceable and provides no guarantee that he would return to face justice.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Richard M. Berman United States District Judge
Recipient of the memorandum.
Jeffrey Epstein Defendant
Referred to as 'the defendant'; subject of the bail hearing.
Mr. Mitchell Proposed Co-Signer
Described as Epstein's 'close personal friend of decades'.
Epstein's Brother Proposed Co-Signer
Unnamed in text but referred to as 'his brother'; offered to pledge a home.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
United States District Court
Southern District of New York (implied by Judge Berman and case context).
Department of Justice’s Office of International Affairs
Cited regarding the unenforceability of anticipatory extradition waivers.

Timeline (1 events)

2019-07-12
Filing of Document 11 in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB
United States District Court
Government Attorneys Judge Richard M. Berman

Locations (2)

Location Context
Jurisdiction handling the case.
A property where the defendant's brother lives half the year, proposed as a pledge.

Relationships (2)

Jeffrey Epstein Friends Mr. Mitchell
Described as 'close personal friend of decades'.
Referred to as 'his brother'.

Key Quotes (3)

"The Court cannot possibly evaluate whether there would be any incentive whatsoever for those the two proposed co-signers to exercise moral suasion over the defendant—or whether... the defendant could easily compensate them, perhaps many times over, for any loss they incurred through the defendant’s flight from justice."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000335.jpg
Quote #1
"Given the defendant’s wealth and his extraordinary risk of flight, any bond for this defendant would assuredly have to be in the hundreds of millions of dollars to even be claimed to be sufficient..."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000335.jpg
Quote #2
"The Department of Justice’s Office of International Affairs is unaware of any country anywhere in the world that would consider an anticipatory extradition waiver binding."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000335.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document