DOJ-OGR-00003117.jpg
977 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court document (government response)
File Size:
977 KB
Summary
This page is from a legal filing (Document 204) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on April 16, 2021. The text argues against the defendant's claims that the indictment is vague or that 'grooming' is not illegal behavior, citing Second Circuit precedents that define grooming as a form of enticement or inducement of minors for illegal sexual activity. The document asserts that the indictment adequately informs the defendant of the charges under 18 U.S.C § 371, § 2422, and § 2243.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Referred to as 'the defendant' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The text discusses charges against her regarding grooming a...
|
| Kozel | Case Citation Subject |
Cited in United States v. Kozel regarding indictment details.
|
| Bunn | Case Citation Subject |
Cited in United States v. Bunn regarding charging elements.
|
| Thompson | Case Citation Subject |
Cited in United States v. Thompson regarding the definition of enticement and grooming.
|
| Dorvee | Case Citation Subject |
Cited in United States v. Dorvee regarding grooming processes.
|
| Brand | Case Citation Subject |
Cited in United States v. Brand regarding sexual advances and grooming behavior.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court |
S.D.N.Y. (Southern District of New York) mentioned in citations.
|
|
| Second Circuit Court of Appeals |
Referenced as '2d Cir.' regarding legal precedents on grooming.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, indicated in footer stamp DOJ-OGR-00003117.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-04-16
Filing of Document 204 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
S.D.N.Y.
United States Government
Ghislaine Maxwell
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Southern District of New York (venue of the case).
|
Relationships (1)
Prosecution arguing against the defendant's motion to dismiss charges in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Key Quotes (3)
"Indeed, 'by providing Defendant with a narrative of the manner in which Defendant is alleged to have committed the charged offenses, the Indictment provides Defendant with more detail than is strictly necessary' under the governing law."Source
DOJ-OGR-00003117.jpg
Quote #1
"In particular, the Second Circuit has for many years found grooming behavior to be a means to 'persuade, induce, or entice' minors to engage in illegal sexual activity."Source
DOJ-OGR-00003117.jpg
Quote #2
"In any event, whether grooming alone constitutes a crime is immaterial to the instant motion, and it will be for the jury to decide whether the evidence at trial, as a whole, establishes the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt."Source
DOJ-OGR-00003117.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document