DOJ-OGR-00002236(1).jpg

724 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing (legal memorandum/order)
File Size: 724 KB
Summary

This is page 4 of a court filing (Document 106) from December 30, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The text discusses the legal standards for reopening a bail hearing under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), citing precedents that a hearing should only be reopened if new information exists that was not known at the time of the original hearing. It introduces the discussion of the Defendant's renewed motion for bail.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Referred to as 'The Defendant' in text; Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN is United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Implied by case number suffix 'AJN'.
Keith Raniere Cited Case Subject
Cited in legal precedent (United States v. Raniere).

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States District Court
Implied by case filing.
Department of Justice
Indicated by footer 'DOJ-OGR'.
2d Cir.
Cited in legal precedents (Second Circuit).

Timeline (2 events)

2020-12-30
Filing of Document 106
New York
Court DOJ
Unknown (Prior to 2020-12-30)
Initial Detention Hearing
Court
Defendant

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction implied by 2d Cir., E.D.N.Y., and W.D.N.Y. citations.

Relationships (1)

Ghislaine Maxwell Adversarial (Legal) United States Government
Case caption United States v. [Defendant] implied by case number.

Key Quotes (3)

"The Defendant bases her renewed motion for bail on both 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f) and the Court’s inherent powers to review its own bail decisions."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002236(1).jpg
Quote #1
"the presumption favoring detention does not disappear entirely, but remains a factor to be considered among those weighed by the district court."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002236(1).jpg
Quote #2
"the Court may reopen the bail hearing if 'information exists that was not known to the movant at the time of the hearing and that has a material bearing on the issue'"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002236(1).jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document