DOJ-OGR-00017286.jpg
548 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
548 KB
Summary
A court transcript page (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting a discussion between the Judge ('The Court') and attorneys (Ms. Sternheim, Ms. Menninger, Ms. Comey) regarding the handling and redaction of jury notes. The parties discuss that counsel knows the identity of jurors, allowing them to see unredacted notes, but public exhibits must be redacted. The transcript ends with the Court reading a note from the jury requesting to end deliberations at 5 p.m.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney (Defense) |
Discussing access to jury notes and arguments.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, managing jury notes and redactions.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney |
Volunteers that they are 'pretty good' at redaction.
|
| Ms. Comey | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Suggests procedure for handling electronic copies and redaction of jury notes.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Implied by DOJ-OGR-00017286 stamp
|
Timeline (2 events)
August 10, 2022 (Filed)
Court proceeding regarding handling of jury notes and redactions.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Court jurisdiction (SDNY)
|
Relationships (2)
Dialogue exchange regarding procedure.
Key Quotes (4)
"Actually, counsel are aware of the identity of the jurors; so I'm comfortable with counsel seeing the note."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017286.jpg
Quote #1
"We're pretty good at it."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017286.jpg
Quote #2
"Recess pending verdict"Source
DOJ-OGR-00017286.jpg
Quote #3
"We would like to end today at 5 p.m., deliberate from"Source
DOJ-OGR-00017286.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document