DOJ-OGR-00001132.jpg

547 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
5
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal defense filing (motion/memorandum)
File Size: 547 KB
Summary

This document is page 30 of a defense filing (Document 197) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 14, 2020. The defense argues that despite the government's initial claims of 'strong' evidence backed by flight logs and diaries, the discovery produced (over 1.2 million documents) contains 'no meaningful documentary corroboration' of the allegations for the indictment period of 1994-1997. The text notes that the majority of evidence produced relates to the 2000s and 2010s, and mentions electronic devices seized from Jeffrey Epstein's residences in 2019.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the allegations; defense argues lack of corroborating evidence against her.
Jeffrey Epstein Deceased Financier/Offender
Mentioned in relation to seized devices and French probe.
AJN Judge
Presiding judge (Initials in case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely Alison J. Nathan).
French prosecutors Investigators
Mentioned in a citation regarding a probe into Epstein and Maxwell in Paris.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The Government
US Prosecution team; accused by defense of overstating evidence strength.
The Court
Judicial body hearing the case.
Daily Mail
News organization cited in a footnote/reference.

Timeline (5 events)

1994-1997
Time period of the conspiracy charged in the indictment.
N/A
2019
Searches of Epstein's residences and seizure of electronic devices.
Epstein's residences
Law Enforcement Jeffrey Epstein
2020-11-09
Production of discovery documents (part of 1.2 million total).
N/A
The Government Defense Team
2020-11-18
Production of discovery documents (part of 1.2 million total).
N/A
The Government Defense Team
2020-12-14
Document filed with the court.
Court
Defense Team

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location of investigation by French prosecutors.
Locations where electronic devices were seized in 2019.

Relationships (2)

The Government Adversarial (Prosecution vs Defendant) Ghislaine Maxwell
Document discusses government allegations against Ms. Maxwell.
Jeffrey Epstein Co-conspirators (alleged) Ghislaine Maxwell
Citation mentions probe to see if Maxwell was involved in Epstein's offending.

Key Quotes (4)

"The Discovery Contains No Meaningful Documentary Corroboration of the Government's Allegations Against Ms. Maxwell"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001132.jpg
Quote #1
"the government represented to the Court that 'the evidence in this case is strong'"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001132.jpg
Quote #2
"The discovery contains no meaningful documentary corroboration of the allegations whatsoever, much less 'significant' corroboration that the Court was led to believe existed."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001132.jpg
Quote #3
"The vast majority of the discovery that the defense has reviewed relates to the time period in the 2000s and the 2010s, well after the conspiracy charged in the indictment (1994-1997)."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001132.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document