DOJ-OGR-00018914.jpg
469 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
469 KB
Summary
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal argument between prosecutor Ms. Moe and the Judge regarding the admissibility of testimony concerning a person named Amanda. The Judge sustains an objection regarding the testimony, noting that previous testimony established a belief that the individual was 17 years old.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor/Government Attorney |
Arguing regarding the admissibility of testimony concerning an individual named Amanda.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Ruling on an objection regarding the classification of evidence and testimony.
|
| Amanda | Potential Victim/Subject of Testimony |
Mentioned by the prosecution; they state they do not intend to argue she is an 'additional victim' at closing.
|
| Shawn | Witness |
Name appears in the header 'Shawn - direct', indicating this sidebar/discussion occurred during or regarding the dire...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Implied by footer code DOJ-OGR
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on case number format and court reporter.
|
Key Quotes (4)
"We don't intend to argue at closing that there's an additional victim Amanda."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018914.jpg
Quote #1
"This is being offered as direct evidence as corroborative testimony of the account of the victims here."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018914.jpg
Quote #2
"The testimony yesterday was she believes she was 17."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018914.jpg
Quote #3
"Sustained."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018914.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document