DOJ-OGR-00014875.jpg

500 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal court opinion / appellate ruling
File Size: 500 KB
Summary

This document is page 25 of a legal opinion (likely from a Court of Appeals) affirming the sentence of Ghislaine Maxwell. The court upholds the District Court's application of a 'leadership enhancement' to her sentence and validates the court's reasoning regarding the gravity of her conduct and her pivotal role in facilitating the abuse of underage girls. It references specific sentencing factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and mentions an individual named Kellen in the context of where the abuse occurred.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant/Appellant
Subject of the sentencing discussion; described as having a 'pivotal role in facilitating the abuse of the underaged ...
Kellen Associate/Employee
Mentioned as working at the location where much of the abuse occurred.
District Court Judicial Body
The lower court whose sentencing decision is being reviewed and upheld.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
District Court
Original sentencing court.
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (2 events)

2021-12-02
Original District Court Filing (referenced in header)
District Court
2024-01-02
Filing of Appellate Court Document
Court of Appeals

Relationships (2)

Ghislaine Maxwell Professional/Co-conspirator Kellen
Text mentions abuse occurred 'where Kellen worked' in the context of Maxwell's leadership enhancement.
Ghislaine Maxwell Abuser/Victim Underaged girls
Reference to Maxwell facilitating the abuse of underaged girls.

Key Quotes (4)

"We therefore hold that the District Court did not err in applying the leadership enhancement."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014875.jpg
Quote #1
"Maxwell’s 'pivotal role in facilitating the abuse of the underaged girls through a series of deceptive tactics.'"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014875.jpg
Quote #2
"The District Court recognized that the sentence 'must reflect the gravity of Ms. Maxwell’s conduct... and the significant and lasting harm it inflicted.'"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014875.jpg
Quote #3
"'a very serious, a very significant sentence is necessary to achieve the purposes of punishment' under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014875.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document