DOJ-OGR-00016954.jpg
558 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
558 KB
Summary
Page 28 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The excerpt details a legal debate between prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach and defense attorney Mr. Everdell before the Judge ('The Court') regarding specific jury instructions concerning 'persuasion and inducement or enticement to travel' and 'significant or motivating purpose.' The Judge overrules a request regarding causation definitions.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Arguing regarding jury instructions on persuasion and inducement to travel.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, ruling on objections regarding jury instructions.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney (Defense) |
Requesting changes/clarifications to jury instructions regarding 'significant or motivating purpose'.
|
Organizations (2)
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court hearing regarding jury instructions in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (1)
Debating legal instructions in court transcript.
Key Quotes (3)
"So I will overrule the request."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016954.jpg
Quote #1
"Well, the instructions say that there has to be persuasion and inducement or enticement to travel, and the individual has to actually travel."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016954.jpg
Quote #2
"It seems to me that the basic suggestion applies additional causation beyond what's required by the ordinary meaning, and I don't see a basis for that."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016954.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document