DOJ-OGR-00021568.jpg
528 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript / legal proceeding
File Size:
528 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) featuring a legal argument between an attorney, Ms. Moe, and the Court regarding the timeline of a conspiracy. Ms. Moe argues that the conspiracy was active throughout 2004 and 2005, citing testimony from a witness named Carolyn who visited Epstein's house continually during that period at ages 17 and 18. The discussion focuses on the legal burden of proof regarding withdrawal from a conspiracy.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney/Prosecutor |
Arguing the government's position regarding the duration of the conspiracy and the burden of proof.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Questioning Ms. Moe's argument regarding what constitutes conspiracy conduct versus non-conspiracy conduct.
|
| Carolyn | Witness/Victim |
Testified that she was continually going to Epstein's house through age 17 and 18 (during 2004 and 2005).
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Alleged Co-conspirator |
Mentioned as the owner of the house where Carolyn visited.
|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Subject of the conspiracy charge; Ms. Moe argues it is the defendant's burden to show withdrawal from the conspiracy.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting service listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by footer DOJ-OGR).
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where Carolyn testified she visited continually through ages 17 and 18.
|
Relationships (2)
Testimony regarding Carolyn continually going to Epstein's house through age 17 and 18.
Key Quotes (4)
"The question is whether a conspiracy was still ongoing throughout 2004."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021568.jpg
Quote #1
"Carolyn testified that she was continually going to Epstein's house through age 17 and through age 18, which would have been throughout the duration of 2004 and 2005."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021568.jpg
Quote #2
"The government is not required to show that any conspirator took an action in between those specific dates because the question is when did the conspiracy terminate?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021568.jpg
Quote #3
"what you point to to make that argument is definitionally non-conspiracy conduct."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021568.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document