DOJ-OGR-00008313.jpg

644 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 644 KB
Summary

This document is page 3 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 10, 2021. Prosecutor Ms. Comey addresses the Court to request a briefing schedule to preclude defense counsel from cross-examining government witnesses on specific topics, citing concerns about witness anonymization, embarrassment, and irrelevant criminal convictions. The Court instructs the parties to engage in further discussion to narrow their disputes before submitting a briefing.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ms. Comey Prosecutor (Government Attorney)
Addressing the court regarding cross-examination topics and witness protection.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the hearing, giving instructions on narrowing disputes.
Defense Counsel Defense Attorneys
Mentioned by Ms. Comey regarding their refusal to limit cross-examination topics.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Government
Referred to as 'the government' in the transcript.
DOJ
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.

Timeline (1 events)

2021-12-10
Court Hearing Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Courtroom

Relationships (2)

Ms. Comey Attorney-Judge The Court
Ms. Comey addresses 'your Honor' and responds to the Court's inquiry.
Government Opposing Counsel Defense Counsel
Discussing disputes over cross-examination topics.

Key Quotes (4)

"The first is that unfortunately I do think we will need to ask for a briefing schedule to preclude cross-examination on certain topics of government witnesses."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008313.jpg
Quote #1
"We presented about a dozen topics that we believe are clearly improper topics for cross-examination."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008313.jpg
Quote #2
"Because there are many of them and because they include things like criminal convictions that are beyond the scope of 609 and other personal information that might either identify anonymized witnesses or embarrass witnesses..."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008313.jpg
Quote #3
"You can, but not until you have further discussion and narrow disputes, because that's going to happen."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008313.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document