DOJ-OGR-00019564.jpg
545 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / correspondence to judge
File Size:
545 KB
Summary
Page 2 of a legal filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 17, 2020. The document discusses the handling of materials marked 'Confidential' by the government, with the defense (Maxwell) arguing that these are 'judicial documents' with a presumptive right of public access, citing Brown v. Maxwell. Large portions of the factual history and footnotes are redacted.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Recipient of the letter/filing ("The Honorable")
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant / Subject |
Objected to government's Confidential designation; seeks to provide material to judicial officers.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Second Circuit |
Court of Appeals referenced for legal precedence regarding 'judicial documents' and 'Confidential' definitions.
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution; marked materials as 'Confidential'.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (inferred from footer DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (2 events)
August 17, 2020
Submission of legal correspondence to Judge Nathan regarding confidential materials.
Court
Prior to August 17, 2020
Ms. Maxwell objected to the government's Confidential designation under paragraph 9 of the Protective Order.
N/A
Relationships (1)
Ms. Maxwell objected to the government's Confidential designation.
Key Quotes (4)
"The items to be referred to (and not filed) are confidential; accordingly, referring to them under seal in the Other Matters will not prejudice the government."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019564.jpg
Quote #1
"The Second Circuit has characterized these types of documents as "judicial documents" with a presumptive right of public access."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019564.jpg
Quote #2
"Ms. Maxwell objected to the government’s Confidential designation, under paragraph 9 of the Protective Order, and requested that the government withdraw the designation."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019564.jpg
Quote #3
"The Court does not need to decide the issue of whether the Material is confidential at this time given that Ms. Maxwell seeks only to provide the Material to judicial officers under seal"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019564.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document