EFTA00036319.pdf
28.9 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain / bureau of prisons internal correspondence
File Size:
28.9 KB
Summary
This document is an email dated August 13, 2019 (three days after Jeffrey Epstein's death), detailing a review of the '292's' (likely SHU logs or suicide watch forms) at MCC New York for the week of August 4, 2019. The email highlights significant procedural discrepancies, including missing Officer in Charge (OIC) signatures, a single staff member signing for five consecutive shifts, missing health services signatures, and undocumented meals and recreation.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| NERO/Corr Svcs~ | Sender |
North East Regional Office Correctional Services, author of the review findings
|
| Unnamed Staff Member | Employee |
Noted for signing as OIC for 5 consecutive shifts
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| NERO |
North East Regional Office (Bureau of Prisons)
|
|
| Corr Svcs |
Correctional Services
|
|
| MCC New York |
Metropolitan Correctional Center, facility where the review took place
|
|
| Verizon |
Service provider mentioned in email signature
|
|
| Samsung |
Device manufacturer mentioned in email signature
|
Timeline (1 events)
2019-08-04
Review period for the '292's' (logs) at MCC New York covering the week leading up to the report date.
MCC New York
MCC New York Staff
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Correctional facility where the discrepancies were found
|
Relationships (1)
NERO conducting review of MCC New York logs
Key Quotes (5)
"A review of the 292's at MCC New York was completed for the week of 8/4/2019"Source
EFTA00036319.pdf
Quote #1
"1) Missing OIC signatures"Source
EFTA00036319.pdf
Quote #2
"2) The same staff member signing as OIC for 5 consecutive shifts"Source
EFTA00036319.pdf
Quote #3
"4) Recreation not documented"Source
EFTA00036319.pdf
Quote #4
"5) Meals not documented"Source
EFTA00036319.pdf
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document