DOJ-OGR-00001949.jpg

638 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 638 KB
Summary

This document is page 72 of a court transcript from the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 10, 2020. The prosecution argues to the Judge that the defendant is a serious flight risk, justifying why they did not offer her the chance to surrender voluntarily. The prosecutor also notes the defendant's lack of candor regarding finances and references separate civil litigation where defense counsel refused to accept service on the defendant's behalf.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Defendant Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell)
Subject of the bail hearing; accused of being a flight risk and lacking candor regarding finances. (Identity confirme...
Your Honor Judge
Addressee of the speaker's arguments.
Defense Counsel Attorney
Representing the defendant; argued the defendant would have surrendered.
The Government Prosecution
Speaker arguing against bail/release, highlighting flight risk.
Plaintiffs Litigants
Parties suing the defendant in separate civil litigation.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Listed in footer.
The Government
Prosecuting entity.
DOJ
Implied by footer stamp DOJ-OGR.

Timeline (3 events)

2020-12-10
Court Hearing (Filing Date)
Southern District of New York
Government Defense Counsel Judge
Prior to hearing
Arrest of the defendant
Unknown
Government Defendant
Prior to hearing
Civil litigation service attempt
Southern District (NY)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and 'this district'.

Relationships (3)

Government Adversarial/Legal Defendant
Government prosecuting defendant, arguing flight risk.
Defense Counsel Legal Representation Defendant
Representation mentioned throughout text.
Plaintiffs Litigation Defendant
Plaintiffs seeking to sue defendant in civil litigation.

Key Quotes (4)

"Why on earth would the government notify the defendant through her counsel that she was about to be indicted and arrested if the government had serious concerns that she was a risk of flight?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001949.jpg
Quote #1
"In fact, the fact that the government took these measures to arrest the defendant reflects how seriously the government takes the risk of the defendant of flight."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001949.jpg
Quote #2
"defense counsel declined to accept service on behalf of plaintiffs who were seeking to sue the defendant in connection with some of these allegations"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001949.jpg
Quote #3
"there is still at this point no substantive response regarding defendant's finances or about the lack of candor"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001949.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document