DOJ-OGR-00021127.jpg

542 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
0
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal brief / court filing (appellate)
File Size: 542 KB
Summary

This page from a legal brief (Case 22-1426) argues that Ms. Maxwell was deprived of an impartial jury due to Juror No. 50 providing false answers during voir dire. It details that the juror concealed his history as a victim of child sexual abuse by his step-brother, justifying his false answers on questions 25, 48, and 49 by citing his 'healing process,' distraction, and personal definition of family.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell Defendant/Appellant
Subject of the trial; arguing her constitutional rights were deprived by Juror 50.
Juror No. 50 Juror
Admitted to giving false answers during voir dire regarding past sexual abuse history.
Juror 50's Step-brother Family Member/Abuser
Identified as the person who sexually abused Juror 50.

Timeline (2 events)

Unknown (Prior to 02/28/2023)
Post-trial Hearing regarding Juror Misconduct
Court
Unknown (Prior to 2023)
Voir Dire (Jury Selection)
Court

Relationships (2)

Juror No. 50 Family/Abuser Step-brother
he did not think of his step-brother who sexually abused him as family
Ms. Maxwell Defendant/Juror Juror No. 50
Juror No. 50’s False Responses Deprived Ms. Maxwell of her Constitutional Right

Key Quotes (4)

"Juror No. 50’s answers to Questions 25 ,48, and 49 were indisputably false."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021127.jpg
Quote #1
"Juror No. 50 admitted that he gave multiple false answers during voir dire which resulted in the concealment of his experience as a victim of child sexual abuse but denied that his misstatements were intentional."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021127.jpg
Quote #2
"his 'healing process' meant that he did not consider himself a victim"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021127.jpg
Quote #3
"he did not think of his step-brother who sexually abused him as family"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021127.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document