DOJ-OGR-00021810.jpg
607 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal brief / court filing (appellate)
File Size:
607 KB
Summary
This page is from a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated September 17, 2024. It argues that the 2003 amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283 (via the PROTECT Act) regarding the statute of limitations for child abuse offenses was intended by Congress to apply retroactively. The document specifically asserts that this amendment applies to Ghislaine Maxwell's conduct as charged in her indictment.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the indictment; document argues the PROTECT Act applies to her conduct.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Congress |
Amended § 3283 in 2003.
|
|
| Department of Justice |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
Cited in footnote 24.
|
Relationships (1)
PROTECT Act’s amendment to § 3283 applies to Maxwell’s conduct as charged in the Indictment.
Key Quotes (2)
"No statute of limitations that would otherwise preclude prosecution for an offense involving the sexual or physical abuse, or kidnaping, of a child under the age of 18 years shall preclude such prosecution during the life of the child."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021810.jpg
Quote #1
"This is enough to conclude that the PROTECT Act’s amendment to § 3283 applies to Maxwell’s conduct as charged in the Indictment."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021810.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document