DOJ-OGR-00001460.jpg

625 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing / court brief (appellate)
File Size: 625 KB
Summary

This page from a legal filing (Case 21-770) argues that Judge Nathan acted within her discretion regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement at the MDC. It asserts that Maxwell failed to provide evidence that MDC protocols interfered with her trial preparation. The document dismisses Maxwell's complaints about conditions—specifically regarding undrinkable water, inadequate food, audio recording of legal visits, and sewage overflows—as bare assertions without evidence.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant/Appellant
Subject of the legal filing regarding her pretrial confinement conditions at the MDC.
Judge Nathan District Court Judge
Judge overseeing the District Court case who denied requests to alter security measures.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
MDC
Metropolitan Detention Center, where Maxwell is confined.
District Court
Lower court where the case originated and where complaints should be reviewed.
DOJ
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (1 events)

Prior to 2021-05-27
Denial of Maxwell's request to alter security measures.
District Court

Locations (2)

Location Context
MDC
Detention facility where Maxwell is held.
Legal venue.

Relationships (1)

Ghislaine Maxwell Judicial Judge Nathan
Judge Nathan acted within her discretion in declining to order the MDC to alter its security measures for Maxwell.

Key Quotes (3)

"Maxwell did not couch her most recent request to the District Court as an application for pretrial release; instead, she sought an order directing the MDC to modify its operations or justify its procedures."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001460.jpg
Quote #1
"Judge Nathan reiterated her commitment to monitoring Maxwell’s conditions of confinement"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001460.jpg
Quote #2
"There is simply no evidence in the record beyond the bare assertions of counsel that MDC’s water is undrinkable, that the MDC provides inadequate food, that the MDC audio records legal visits, or that sewage overflows"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001460.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document