DOJ-OGR-00009831.jpg

709 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

1
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing (government memorandum of law)
File Size: 709 KB
Summary

This page is from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated March 11, 2022. It contains legal arguments citing case law (Gagnon, Moten, Calbas) regarding the standards for post-verdict jury inquiries. The Government argues that the standard for a hearing has been met specifically regarding 'Juror 50' due to inconsistencies between the juror's public statements about being a sexual abuse victim and their answer to Question 48 on the juror questionnaire. The Government consents to a hearing to determine if Juror 50 deliberately lied.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Juror 50 Juror
Subject of a proposed post-verdict hearing regarding potential misconduct and lying on a questionnaire about past sex...

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
United States Government
Filing the document, consenting to a limited hearing.
District Court
Has the power to supervise inquiries.
2d Cir.
Second Circuit Court of Appeals (cited in case law).
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York (cited in case law).

Timeline (2 events)

2022-03-11
Filing of Document 643 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Court
Future/Proposed
Post-verdict hearing regarding Juror 50
District Court
Juror 50 Court Government

Locations (1)

Location Context
Southern District of New York (referenced in legal citation)

Relationships (1)

Juror 50 Legal Scrutiny United States Government
Government consents to a hearing to determine if Juror 50 lied.

Key Quotes (3)

"the Government believes that the exacting standard for a post-verdict hearing has been met only with respect to Juror 50 and the apparent inconsistency between his several public statements (including one on video) about being a victim of sexual abuse and his answer to Question 48 on the juror questionnaire."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009831.jpg
Quote #1
"Thus, the Government consents to a hearing in order to determine (1) whether Juror 50 deliberately lied in response to Question"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009831.jpg
Quote #2
"“[t]he object of the proceeding is to permit the truth to be discovered with the least possible harm to other interests.”"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009831.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document