DOJ-OGR-00009381.jpg
470 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
470 KB
Summary
This page is a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. It features a redirect examination of a witness named Brune by the Court. The discussion centers on the vetting of 'Juror No. 1,' specifically whether the witness knew the juror was a suspended lawyer and why the witness did not alert the government to this possibility, assuming the government had also 'Googled' the jurors.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness |
Undergoing redirect examination regarding jury research methods.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Questioning the witness about why they did not share information about Juror No. 1 with the government.
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
Subject of discussion; potentially a suspended lawyer.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Westlaw |
Legal research database mentioned regarding a report on the juror.
|
|
|
Search engine used to research the juror.
|
||
| The Government |
Refers to the prosecution/DOJ team involved in the case.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency.
|
Relationships (1)
Witness states: 'I think that the government and I come to different conclusions sometimes about things'
Key Quotes (2)
"Did you ever consider consulting with the government about the wild possibility that Juror No. 1 was in fact a suspended lawyer..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009381.jpg
Quote #1
"I assumed that the government and its paralegals and all the rest Googled the jurors and I don't always agree with them, but they're pretty good investigators..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009381.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document